Wills & Estates
What happens to the animals
Pets are property in law, they are family in fact, and the gap between those two positions produces some genuinely bad outcomes.

Animals belonging to someone who has died are, in most legal systems, part of the estate — property, to be dealt with like other property.
They are also living creatures requiring immediate care, at a moment when everyone is distracted, and rescue organisations report receiving animals in exactly these circumstances constantly.
The immediate problem
Somebody has to feed the animals tonight.
If the person lived alone and died suddenly, animals may be in the house for a period before anyone realises. In several countries emergency services and neighbours find them.
Practical measures that address this: telling a neighbour that you have animals, keeping a card in your wallet stating that there are animals at home and who to contact, and having an arrangement with someone who has a key.
The wallet card is trivially easy and it works.
What people usually intend and how it fails
Most people assume a family member will take the animal. Frequently that assumption is unspoken, and frequently the family member has never agreed and cannot — because of allergies, housing restrictions, existing animals, or simply not wanting to.
What then happens is a difficult conversation among grieving people, followed in many cases by rehoming or surrender.
Older animals in particular are hard to rehome, and the outcome is sometimes euthanasia.
What to arrange
Ask someone, and confirm they agree. The single most important step.
Ask specifically, name the animal, and check they are willing and able. Ask a second person as a backup.
Name them in the will, gifting the animal to that person. In most jurisdictions this works because the animal is property.
Leave money with the animal. A sum to the person taking it, intended for the animal's care, removes the financial burden and makes acceptance considerably more likely.
In most systems this is a gift to the person rather than a fund for the animal, and there is generally no mechanism to enforce that it is spent on the animal — which is why the choice of person matters more than the drafting.
Consider a trust where the sums are substantial. Whether a trust for the benefit of an animal is valid varies considerably by jurisdiction. Some systems permit them explicitly; others do not recognise them because the beneficiary must be a person.
Where they are not valid, the workable alternative is a gift to a named person coupled with a moral obligation stated in a letter of wishes.
Charity schemes. Many animal charities operate arrangements under which they will take and rehome an animal on the owner's death, generally requiring registration in advance and sometimes a legacy.
These are a reasonable option for people without an obvious individual, and it is worth checking the terms — whether rehoming is guaranteed, what happens to older or unwell animals, and whether the charity retains ownership.
The practical information to leave
Frequently more useful than the money.
The vet's details and the animal's medical history. Medications and doses. What it eats and how much. Its routine. Its temperament, what frightens it, whether it is good with children or other animals. Whether it is microchipped and insured, and with whom.
Microchip registration should be updated, and it is worth noting who should be recorded as the new keeper.
Pet insurance generally ends on the owner's death; the new owner will need their own.
Horses and larger animals
A different scale of problem. Livery costs continue, and a horse cannot be absorbed into a household.
Specific arrangements are essential, including who has authority to make decisions immediately and how costs will be met in the interim.
Several equine charities operate schemes similar to those for companion animals.
Animals in a business context
Working animals, breeding animals and livestock form part of the business and require different arrangements, generally as part of business succession planning.
The executor's position
An executor faced with animals and no instructions is in a difficult position.
They have a duty to preserve the estate's assets, which technically includes the animal, and an immediate practical obligation to ensure it is cared for.
Reasonable steps: arrange immediate care, contact anyone the deceased mentioned, contact the vet, who may know of arrangements, and contact a reputable rehoming organisation if no home can be found.
Costs of care are generally recoverable as an estate expense.
Euthanasia of a healthy animal on the basis of a direction in a will is a request executors sometimes encounter. Whether such a direction is enforceable varies, and in many jurisdictions it would be contrary to public policy or to animal welfare legislation, and vets would decline.
If your concern is that nobody will care for the animal properly, arranging a home is the answer rather than a direction of that kind.
The conversation worth having
If you have an animal and no arrangement, this is a ten-minute task.
Ask someone. Get their agreement. Write it down. Tell your executor. Put a card in your wallet.
People do this for their possessions and not for the creature that will be waiting by the door.
This is general information, not legal advice. The status of pet trusts and the enforceability of directions concerning animals differ substantially by jurisdiction.
Also by Daniel Krajewski
- A digital estate checklistDigital Legacy
- The annual review: half an hour, once a yearWills & Estates
- Making a will yourself, and when not toWills & Estates
- When you are both the executor and the familyFamily Conversations





