Digital Legacy
Legacy Contact Settings And What They Actually Allow
Several large platforms let a user nominate someone to handle their account after death, but the powers granted are narrow and differ sharply between services.

The major platforms have built their own inheritance mechanisms. They are quick to set up, and they grant considerably less than most people assume.
The nomination is a contractual permission
These settings work because the account holder gives the provider advance permission to release something to a named person. They operate under the service's terms rather than under succession law.
That makes them fast, since no court document is needed, and limited, since the provider decides what the nominated person may do.
They also sit outside the will. A named legacy contact and a different beneficiary in the will can point in opposite directions.
What is typically granted
Common permissions include memorialising a profile, downloading a copy of stored content, responding to messages of condolence and closing the account.
Full access to private messages is usually excluded, because the other party to a conversation never consented to their messages being disclosed.
Some services allow a nominated person to request an archive after a defined period of inactivity rather than on proof of death, which is a different trigger entirely.
The settings are buried and easily forgotten
These options sit several levels into account settings, often under security or personal information, and they are rarely surfaced during normal use.
They are also silent once set. Nothing reminds the account holder that a nomination exists, and a person named years ago may since have become an unsuitable choice.
Reviewing them alongside other periodic checks, and telling the nominated person they hold the role, is what makes them function.
Where no mechanism exists
Plenty of services offer nothing of the kind. The fallback is a formal request supported by a death certificate, which is slower and often results only in closure.
Some jurisdictions have legislated to give executors defined rights over digital accounts, which can override restrictive terms of service. Coverage is uneven and still developing.
Where nothing applies, the only reliable route is the one prepared in advance: a device that can be unlocked, a recovery method that still works, and a note explaining what is where.
Recording the choices somewhere findable
A short list of which services have a nomination, who was named, and what they were authorised to do saves an executor a great deal of guesswork.
Platform features and the law on executor access to accounts both change frequently, so current terms should be checked directly and a solicitor consulted where the content has real value.
Also by Daniel Krajewski
- The annual review: half an hour, once a yearWills & Estates
- Making a will yourself, and when not toWills & Estates
- When you are both the executor and the familyFamily Conversations
- Phones, laptops and what to do with the devicesDigital Legacy





