Digital Legacy
Recording Access Without Writing Down Passwords
Leaving a plain list of credentials is unsafe and quickly outdated; a map of where access lives keeps the information useful without creating a security problem.

The instinct is to write everything down. A list of passwords in a drawer solves one problem and creates several worse ones.
A written list decays and exposes
Passwords change, and a list is accurate only on the day it is written. Within a year most entries fail, and the failures are indistinguishable from the ones that still work.
A complete list is also a single object that gives whoever finds it total control of a person's financial and personal life, with no audit trail.
Many providers' terms prohibit sharing credentials, so using a list can put the person who uses it in breach of an agreement even when the intention is entirely proper.
A map is more durable than a list
What survives change is structure. Naming the password manager, the email account it depends on, the phone that supplies codes and where recovery codes are stored stays accurate for years.
Such a document contains no secrets, so it can sit with a will or in a home file without creating exposure if it is seen.
It also tells an executor what exists, which is the harder half of the problem. Accounts nobody knows about are the ones that cause trouble.
The master credential can be split from the map
One workable arrangement keeps the map with the will and the single master password separately, in a sealed envelope with a solicitor or in a bank facility.
Some password managers include an emergency access feature that grants a nominated person entry after a delay, which achieves the same result within the tool itself.
Either route keeps one secret in one controlled place rather than dozens scattered across a notebook.
Say what should happen, not only how to get in
Access without instruction leaves an executor guessing. A line against each significant account saying close, preserve, transfer or download removes most of that uncertainty.
It also spares relatives from making guesses about private material, which is a burden people rarely intend to leave behind.
Reviewing it once a year
The map needs revisiting when the phone changes, when the email provider changes, or when a new account holds anything significant.
Provider terms and the legal position on executor access vary by jurisdiction and change frequently, so a solicitor should advise on how any such document is best held.
Also by Daniel Krajewski
- The annual review: half an hour, once a yearWills & Estates
- Making a will yourself, and when not toWills & Estates
- When you are both the executor and the familyFamily Conversations
- Phones, laptops and what to do with the devicesDigital Legacy





