Digital Legacy
Social media accounts after a death
Platforms have developed policies for accounts of people who have died, and the options differ considerably. What you can arrange in advance is more than most people realise.

Social accounts outlive their owners, and they behave in ways that catch families out — birthday reminders, suggestions to reconnect, and the account appearing in searches indefinitely.
Platforms have developed policies. They vary and they generally require action from someone.
The broad categories of option
Memorialisation. The account is preserved in a modified state, generally with an indication that the person has died, with existing content remaining visible and some functions disabled — typically login, and frequently the birthday reminders and friend suggestions that cause distress.
Deletion. The account and its content are removed.
Limited access or download. Some platforms permit a nominated person or a verified next of kin to download content, without providing login access.
Nothing. Some platforms have no policy and the account simply persists.
What can be set up in advance
This is the useful part, and it requires an hour in your account settings.
Several major platforms offer a setting allowing you to nominate a contact who will be given limited control after your death, or to specify that the account should be deleted.
Others offer an inactive account manager, which after a defined period of inactivity either notifies a nominated person, shares specified data with them, or deletes the account.
These are configured by you, in the settings, and they are the mechanism most likely to produce the outcome you want.
Go through the accounts that matter and look for anything labelled legacy contact, memorialisation, inactive account, or digital legacy.
What families have to do without advance arrangements
Generally: a request through a form, supported by documentation — a death certificate, proof of relationship, sometimes proof of authority to act.
Responses vary in speed from days to months, and requests are sometimes refused or simply not answered.
Executors should expect this to be slower and more frustrating than dealing with financial institutions, because there is no regulatory obligation on platforms to cooperate in most jurisdictions.
The arguments about memorialisation
Worth thinking about in advance, because families frequently disagree.
For preserving: it holds photographs and messages that exist nowhere else. It provides a place where people gather and post on anniversaries, which many bereaved people find genuinely valuable. It is a record of a life.
For deleting: the account contains private messages the person may not have wanted read. It generates unexpected reminders that are painful. Some family members find its persistence distressing. And it is a repository of personal data that continues to exist under a company's control indefinitely.
There is no correct answer, and stating your preference in advance removes an argument.
The privacy question
Under-discussed and genuinely difficult.
An account contains correspondence with living people who did not consent to it being read.
Data protection frameworks in various jurisdictions treat the deceased's own data differently — in some, protection ends at death; in others it persists for a period.
The practical position is that families who gain access frequently read things the person would not have wanted them to read, and there is no mechanism preventing it.
If there is material in your accounts you would not want seen, deal with it now rather than relying on anyone's discretion later.
Practical points for families
Do not rush. Deletion is irreversible. Retrieve content first.
Download the archive if you can. Most major platforms have a data export function producing a complete archive of posts, photographs and messages. Do this before requesting memorialisation or deletion, since some options restrict access afterwards.
Screenshot what matters if you cannot get an export.
Be careful with impersonation. Logging in as the deceased using their credentials may breach terms of service and, in some jurisdictions, may have legal implications. Families do it constantly and it is worth knowing that it is not clearly permitted.
Expect the process to be slow and to require documentation.
The accounts people forget
Beyond the obvious social platforms: dating profiles, which continue to appear; forum and community accounts; gaming accounts, which may hold significant purchased value; professional networking profiles; review accounts; and the account on the website nobody remembers.
A list, made in advance, addresses all of them.
What to write down
A short statement of what you want: which accounts should be deleted, which preserved, who should decide about anything else.
Put it with your other documents rather than in the will, since a will may become public.
Tell someone it exists.
Platform policies change frequently. Check the current settings and options in the accounts you use. Legal rights of executors regarding digital accounts differ by jurisdiction and by platform terms.
Also by Daniel Krajewski
- A digital estate checklistDigital Legacy
- The annual review: half an hour, once a yearWills & Estates
- Making a will yourself, and when not toWills & Estates
- When you are both the executor and the familyFamily Conversations





